Search Results for "beneficiary company"

456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case for Pharmaceutical Freebies. Expenses on Gifting Freebies to Medical Practitioners Are Deductible Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as Indian Medical Council Regulations Only Prohibit Acceptance, Not Gifting, Under Explanation 1.

The dispute involved a pharmaceutical company, referred to as Apex, appealing against a High Court judgment that upheld orders disallowing part of its...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Restrain Bank Guarantee Invocation in Contract Dispute. No Fraud or Special Equities Established to Prevent ONGC from Encashing Bank Guarantees Furnished by Mercator Oil & Gas.

The appellant, Mercator Oil & Gas Limited, had entered into a contract with the first respondent, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Declaration for Sugar Factory Due to Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Collector Failed to Prepare Independent Report or Submit Recommendations, Relying Instead on Beneficiary's Chart, Rendering Section 6 Declaration Invalid.

The petitioners, Sukumar M. Khot and others, challenged a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, published on 23 June 2005, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Upheld at Rs.7,500 per Are. Comparable Sale Instances Justify Enhanced Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case arises from the acquisition of agricultural land belonging to the respondent-claimant, Ganpat Sonu Khedekar, for the Konkan Railway project. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Konkan Railway Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication on Merits. Non-joinder of Acquiring Body as Party in Land Reference Proceedings Held Fatal to Award-Decree.

The case involves a land acquisition for the Konkan Railway project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer acquired 78.40 Ares of land from the respond...