Search Results for "advisory jurisdiction"

752 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 752 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Right to Representation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Infringed Due to Non-Supply of Grounds in Understandable Language and Unexplained Delay.

The Bombay High Court allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Karnataka Act for Twelve Months in First Instance. Detention Order Held Illegal as Contravening Proviso to Section 3(2) and Supreme Court Precedent in Cherukuri Mani; Detenu Ordered Released.

The petitioner, Yallappa, a poor coolie living with his wife and children in Raichur, was detained under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Challenging COFEPOSA Detention Orders on Grounds of Constructive Res Judicata. Fresh Grounds Must Be Raised in Earlier Petitions or Are Barred.

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders of detention passed under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutionality of Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011. Petitioners Seek to Strike Down Act as Discriminatory and Violative of Fundamental Rights.

This batch of writ petitions was instituted by several temple trusts from Uttara Kannada and Belgaum districts of Karnataka before the Dharwad Bench o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Forfeiture of Property Under SAFEMA Despite Revocation of Detention Order. Property of Detenu Forfeited Under Sections 7 and 19(1) of SAFEMA Upheld as Detention Order Was Valid When Forfeiture Order Was Passed.

The petitioner, Smt. Padma Nirmal Agarwal, challenged the forfeiture of a flat (Flat No.16, 471/C, Manu Mahal, King's Circle, Mumbai) under the Smuggl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Dengue Outbreak Based on Letter to Editor, Directs State to Implement Preventive Measures. Right to Health Under Article 21 Obligates State to Control Vector-Borne Diseases.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided by Chief Justice N.V. Anjaria and Justice K.V. Aravind, delivered a judgment on February 13, 2025, ...