Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

716 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 716 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Oral Agreement Not Proved. Plaintiff failed to establish oral agreement, payment of consideration, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellants (original defendant nos. 2 to 4) challenged the judgment and decree dated 18/02/2014 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Television Production Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Reputation. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that claimant failed to prove loss of reputation due to alleged breach of contract.

The petitioners, Star India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Regular First Appeals — Appellant Permitted to Prosecute Appeals Against Decree in Suit for Specific Performance. Delay of 3 Days Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown Under Section 151 CPC.

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha Kothari, filed three miscellaneous civil applications under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking perm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Regular First Appeals — Sufficient Cause Shown for Delay of 100 Days. Appellant's Bonafide Belief That Husband Was Taking Steps to File Appeal Constitutes Sufficient Cause Under Section 151 CPC.

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha Kothari, filed three miscellaneous civil petitions under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking condona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Regular First Appeals — Appellant Permitted to Prosecute Appeals on Merits. The court held that the delay was not intentional and sufficient cause was shown, thus condoning the delay under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha Kothari, filed three miscellaneous civil petitions under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permiss...