Search Results for "Tax invoice"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Tax invoice"

388 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 388 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of DEEC Shipping Bill to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 Mandates Prior Denial of DEEC Benefit by DGFT or Customs Authorities, Which Was Not Established.

5 Jan 2016

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Show Cause Notice Issued After Six Years Held Time-Barred as Assessee Did Not Suppress Facts.

22 Jun 2011

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order of the Customs, Excise a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Rebate Claim Case Due to Limitation Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act. Rebate of duty on exports is governed by the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B, as 'refund' includes 'rebate' under Explanation (A) to that section.

29 Nov 2022

The appellant, Sansera Engineering Limited, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported goods between August 2015 and October 2015 and filed claims fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 requires prior denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs; mere inability to utilize advance license does not qualify.

5 Jan 2016

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in GST Case Due to Availability of Statutory Alternative Remedy. High Court Erred in Entertaining Writ Petition Under Article 226 of Constitution as No Exceptional Circumstances Like Breach of Fundamental Rights or Violation of Natural Justice Were Established, and Respondent Should Have Availed Remedy Under Section 107 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

3 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a judgment of the High Court of Telangana dated 4 March 2020, which set aside the action of the Assistant Commissioner of State...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicated Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Award in Lease Finance Dispute. The Award Held Lessee Liable for Tax Demands Arising from Disallowance of Depreciation Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

9 Jan 2015

The matter pertains to an arbitration petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicatur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

16 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Challenging Service Tax Demand and Section 35F Validity — Petitioner Relegated to Alternate Remedy of Appeal. Constitutional challenge to Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 not entertained as validity already upheld; factual disputes remitted to appellate authority.

10 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Tyresoles India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 14 October 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Central Exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Pharmaceutical and Polyester Manufacturers for LBT Exemption Under Rule 28(6) of BPMC (LBT) Rules, 2010. Court Holds That Exemption for Goods Used in Export Covers All Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exported Finished Products, Irrespective of Place of Processing.

14 Oct 2014

These three connected writ petitions filed by pharmaceutical and polyester manufacturing companies challenged the orders of the Aurangabad Municipal C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CESTAT Order Rejecting Recall of Fraud Finding in CENVAT Credit Case. Court holds that CESTAT's finding of mis-statement and fraud was not a reviewable error and that the Tribunal had inherent power to impose costs for abuse of process.

25 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Essel Propack Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing plastic tubes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)