Search Results for "Rule 27(1)"

589 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 589 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid When Based on Same Material Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Shivam Ispat Private Limited, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2016-2017 declaring total income of Rs.32,58,510/-. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement and Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. FIR under Sections 498-A, 417, 406, 323, 504, 506 IPC quashed as alleged incidents occurred outside Jalgaon and parties settled.

The petitioners, including the husband Damodar Rambhau Gulhane and his relatives, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Probate Petition for Will Executed by NRI in Ecuador. Will executed abroad by Non-Resident Indian held valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, and probate granted to executor in Mumbai.

The petitioner, Sarwan Kumar Jhabarmal Choudhary, filed a testamentary petition (L) No. 6300 of 2024 in the Bombay High Court seeking probate of the L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal Against Confiscation of Foodgrains; Forfeiture of Juar Held Illegal Due to Lack of Express Provision, While Rule 141(2) Defence of India Rules Upheld as Intra Vires

The appellant was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mehkar under three orders: Maharashtra Jwar (Restriction on Purchase and Sale and...