Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement and Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. FIR under Sections 498-A, 417, 406, 323, 504, 506 IPC quashed as alleged incidents occurred outside Jalgaon and parties settled.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, including the husband Damodar Rambhau Gulhane and his relatives, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 343 of 2015 registered at MIDC Police Station, Jalgaon. The FIR was lodged by respondent No. 2, Mayuri Damodar Gulhane, the wife of petitioner No. 1, alleging offences under Sections 498-A, 417, 406, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioners contended that the FIR was filed with malafide intentions and that no part of the cause of action arose within the territorial jurisdiction of MIDC Police Station, Jalgaon, as the alleged incidents occurred at Nagpur, Wardha, and Amravati. They also submitted that the parties had amicably settled their disputes and were living together as husband and wife, and the complainant had no objection to the quashing of the FIR. The State opposed the petition, arguing that the investigation was at an advanced stage. However, the court, after hearing the parties, noted that the allegations in the FIR did not disclose any incident occurring within Jalgaon jurisdiction. The court held that continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, especially in light of the settlement. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings, and made the rule absolute.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Territorial Jurisdiction - Sections 482, 177, 178, 179 CrPC - FIR registered at MIDC Police Station, Jalgaon for offences under Sections 498-A, 417, 406, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC - Alleged incidents occurred at Nagpur, Wardha, and Amravati, not within Jalgaon jurisdiction - Held that the FIR is liable to be quashed for lack of territorial jurisdiction as no part of cause of action arose within Jalgaon (Paras 2-5).

B) Matrimonial Law - Settlement - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Parties have amicably settled the dispute and are living together - Complainant wife has no objection to quashing - Held that in view of settlement, continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of court, hence FIR quashed (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered at MIDC Police Station, Jalgaon is liable to be quashed on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction and due to settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. FIR No. 343 of 2015 registered with MIDC Police Station, Jalgaon and all consequential proceedings are quashed. Rule is made absolute.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Territorial jurisdiction
  • Settlement between parties
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Matrimonial disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (01) 79

Criminal Writ Petition No. 271 of 2016

2017-01-11

S.S. Shinde, K.K. Sonawane

Mr. Sanket S. Kulkarni for petitioners, Mr. M. M. Nerlikar APP for Respondent No. 1, Mr. Girish Nagori for Respondent No. 2

Damodar Rambhul Gulhane and others

The State of Maharashtra and Mrs. Mayuri Damodar Gulhane

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 343 of 2015 registered at MIDC Police Station, Jalgaon for offences under Sections 498-A, 417, 406, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC.

Filing Reason

The FIR was filed by respondent No. 2 (wife) against her husband and in-laws alleging dowry harassment and other offences. Petitioners contended that no part of cause of action arose within Jalgaon jurisdiction and that the matter was settled.

Issues

Whether the FIR is liable to be quashed for lack of territorial jurisdiction? Whether the FIR can be quashed in view of settlement between the parties?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the alleged incidents occurred at Nagpur, Wardha, and Amravati, not within Jalgaon jurisdiction, and that the FIR was malafide. Petitioners submitted that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and are living together, and the complainant has no objection to quashing. State opposed the petition, stating that investigation was at an advanced stage.

Ratio Decidendi

An FIR can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC if no part of the cause of action arose within the territorial jurisdiction of the police station where it was registered, and if the parties have amicably settled the dispute, continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of court.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners invites our attention to the allegations made in the criminal complaint No. 3464 of 2015 filed by respondent No. 2 against petitioner No. 3-Babybai, mother in law of respondent No. 2 and petitioner No. 1 - Damodhar husband of respondent No. 2. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 271 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) challenging FIR No. 343 of 2015 registered on 17-12-2015 at MIDC Police Station, Jalgaon. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 11-01-2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498-A, 417, 406, 323, 504, 506, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482, 177, 178, 179
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement and Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. FIR under Sections 498-A, 417, 406, 323, 504, 506 IPC quashed as alleged incidents occurred outside Jalgaon and parties settled.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition in Family Property Dispute — Settlement Agreement Binding, Third Party Claims Based on Agreement to Sell Not Recognized. The Court held that the contempt petition is premature as execution proceedings are o...