Search Results for "Permanent Appointment"

2015 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2015 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking to Restrain Former Additional Judges from Practicing in Lower Courts. Article 220 of the Constitution does not apply to Additional Judges who resigned before confirmation, as they are not 'permanent Judges' within the meaning of the provision.

The petitioner, Nitin Shankar Deshpande, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking to restrain Respondents 5 to 9, who were ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Against Employer for Unfair Labour Practices in MRTU & PULP Act Case. Employer directed to reinstate employee with full back wages and permanency benefits for engaging in unfair labour practices under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in supply of textile machinery and civil construction, challenged th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Repatriation Order in MRTU & PULP Act Complaint. Transfer from EDP Section to Generation Side Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice as Employee Had No Right to Continue in Particular Post.

The petitioner, Promod Singh Hanuman Singh Parihar, was employed as a Sub-Engineer/Chargeman Grade II in the Generation side of the Maharashtra State ...