Search Results for "POCSO"

526 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 526 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Inconsistency and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f)(l) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as DNA report excluded semen and blood of accused, and victim's testimony was tutored.

The appellant, Bhaiyya S/o Vijay Chakre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Achalpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(l) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds 10-Year Imprisonment for Sexual Assault of a Minor. The Bombay High Court affirms the conviction under IPC and POCSO Act, dismissing the appellant's claims of false implication and procedural lapses.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal challenging a 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case — Upholds Conviction for Rape of Five-Year-Old Based on DNA Evidence. Semen on Victim's Clothes Matched Accused's DNA, Corroborating Victim's Account Despite Absence of Physical Injuries.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of the accused for the rape of a five-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i)(j) IPC and Section 5(m)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Non-Consensual Nature of Relationship.

The appellant, Pravin Popat Kharat, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC and Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent and Age Discrepancy Cast Doubt on Prosecution Case, Leading to Acquittal Under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Mahesh Bhimraj Jadhav, was convicted by the Designated Court under the POCSO Act for the rape of a 17-year-old girl. The prosecution al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the allegations.

The appellant, Narayana Swamy, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapura (sitting at Chintamani) in Spl.S.C.No.3...