Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003"

238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival Claims Over Control of Church Assets and Applicability of 1934 Constitution Pending Adjudication.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from judgments and decrees of the High Court of Kerala in three sets of suits concerning chur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Assessee's Appeal in Sales Tax Case — Revisional Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Penalty under Section 8(3)(b) of CST Act, 1956 Quashed as Assessee Was Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Driver of Vehicle.

The appellant, M/S Apotex Research Private Limited, an assessee under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed a Sales Tax Appeal under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Order of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Recovery Proceedings. The Case Involves Settlement and Auction of Property of Bradbury Mills Ltd., a Company in Liquidation, with Multiple Creditors and Guarantors.

The writ petition was filed by Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 22 August 2008, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Sales Tax Case — Re-assessment Not Permissible Under Rectification of Mistake. The Court held that rectification under Section 69 of the KVAT Act cannot be used to re-assess escaped turnover without following the procedure under Section 39.

The petitioner, M/s. Hema Engineering, a dealer registered under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed revision petitions under Section 65(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order in Service Tax Case — Limitation Bar Not Applicable. The court held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds when the appeal was filed within the prescribed period under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, M/s. Practice Strategic Communications India Private Limited, a company providing management services, was issued a show cause notice ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Remands Matter to Tribunal for Fresh Consideration on Input Tax Credit Disallowance. The court held that the Tribunal must decide appeals on merits and cannot dismiss them without examining the grounds raised by the assessee.

The petitioner, M/s. Manasa Electricals Co., is a trader in electrical goods. For the assessment year 2005-06, the petitioner filed KVAT returns in Fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeals Against Revisional Order Under KVAT Act — Remand to Assessing Officer Required. Revisional Authority Under Section 63A Cannot Pass Fresh Assessment Order After Setting Aside Original Assessment; Must Remand to Assessing Officer.

The appellant, M/s Solidus Hi Tech Products Pvt Ltd, a company manufacturing press components, sheet metal enclosures, telecommunication equipments, b...