Search Results for "Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005"

210 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka heard regular second appeals challenging concurrent lower court findings in a civil suit for declaration and injunction. The appeals were filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgments of the Senior Civil Judge, Channapatna.

16 Dec 2024

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Property Partition Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as the court found no error in the judgment dated 7.9.2012 in RSA No.5985/2010 regarding share fixation.

2 Sep 2014

The review petition was filed by the petitioners (legal representatives of the deceased original plaintiff) against the judgment dated 7.9.2012 passed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Final Decree in Partition Suit. Court holds that the trial court erred in rejecting application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC without considering that the summons were not duly served and the petitioners had sufficient cause for non-appearance.

26 Mar 2014

The petitioners, who were defendants in a partition suit (O.S. No. 7/2007), filed applications under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for partition dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove joint family property and possession; no substantial question of law arose.

21 Jun 2024

The present second appeal was filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant No.1 challenging the judgment and de...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal by Charitable Society Regarding Leave to Institute Suit Under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Dispute Involves Whether a Society Registered Under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 Can Be Treated as a Trust and Sought Determination of the Conditions for Granting Leave Following Allegations of Financial Mismanagement and Breach of Trust.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a suit instituted under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by two plaintiffs, Dr. Shelly Batra and Mrs. Usha Gupta...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that the trial court did not err in rejecting application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC for recalling witnesses, as the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the evidence sought to be adduced was not within their knowledge earlier.

14 Sep 2020

The case arises from a civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the petitioners (defendants in th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Limitation. Court holds that the first appellate court failed to properly consider the plea of adverse possession and limitation, and remands the matter for fresh consideration.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for partition and separate possessi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim by Co-owner. Court holds that a co-owner in possession cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is ouster or denial of title, and that a preliminary decree for partition can be passed even if some properties are not available for division.

12 Nov 2021

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2015...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Restrains Interference and Construction Pending Suit. Prima facie case established regarding joint family property and partnership firm rights under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

13 Dec 2024

The appellants, Mr. Parth Ghorpade and Mr. Sarvajeet Ghorpade, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) read with Section 151 of th...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)