Search Results for "Heirs and legal representatives"

1355 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1355 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Successor States to Pay Employees of State-Owned Corporations Following Bifurcation Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 — Prolonged Non-Payment Violates Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.

The present writ petition was filed by the Bihar State Ardh Sarkari Arajpati Karamchari Maha Sangh and others, representing thousands of employees of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Co-operative Society's Writ Petitions Against Unauthorized Construction by Members. Dispute Between Society and Member Regarding Unauthorized Construction and Possession is Barred from Civil Court Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, The Manglorian Garden Homes Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed three writ petitions challenging the orders of the Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal as Abated Due to Non-Substitution of Legal Heirs of Deceased Appellant in Property Title Suit. Appeal Abates Entirely When Deceased Appellant's Interest is Inseparable from Co-Appellants, Rendering Inconsistent Decrees Impossible.

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals filed by the defendants/appellants against the judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh which had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Impleadment of Legal Representatives as Defendants in Individual Capacity in Specific Performance Suit. Order I Rule 10 CPC Allows Addition of Necessary Parties Claiming Independent Rights in Suit Property Despite Already Being on Record as LRs.

The petitioner filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 11-11-2009 executed by the deceased defendant no.1 in respect of suit prope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...