Search Results for "Customs appeal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Customs appeal"

1746 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1746 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Prohibition Order Against Customs Broker in Licensing Dispute — Regulation 23 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 Cannot Be Invoked Without Prior Suspension or Revocation Proceedings. The court held that Regulation 23 is a residuary power for urgent preventive action and cannot be used to bypass the specific procedures for suspension and revocation under Regulations 17 and 20.

6 Feb 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Cargomar, a customs broker governed by the Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, filed a writ pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Customs Appraiser for Negligence in Duty — Reduction in Pay Sustained. Petitioner failed to exercise due diligence in verifying import consignment, leading to revenue loss, and the penalty of reduction in pay by three stages for one year was proportionate to the misconduct.

20 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Satyendra Singh Gurjar, was a Customs Appraiser recruited through the Civil Services Examination, 1996. On 5 December 2006, while post...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Revenue Appeals on Duty Liability for Confiscated Medical Equipment Cleared Under Conditional Exemption Notification No. 64/88-Cus. Court Examines Whether Redemption of Goods is a Pre-Condition for Customs Duty Demand Under Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.

28 Apr 2006

Background: The case involves two customs appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, filed by the Commissioner of Customs against separate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Petition Against Interest Demand on Differential Customs Duty for Goods Imported Prior to Introduction of Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962. The Court held that interest under Section 28AA cannot be levied retrospectively for imports completed in 1986-1987.

9 Aug 2019

The Union of India, through the Controller of Stores, Central Railway, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 5 July 2006 and su...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Provisional Release of Seized Car in Customs Case Pending Adjudication. Petitioner's imported Ford Mustang GT seized on suspicion of being a 1967 model; court orders release on furnishing bond and bank guarantee under Customs Act, 1962.

8 Sep 2020

The petitioner, Sidharth Vijay Shah, imported a 2019 RHD Ford Mustang GT Coupe sports car valued at USD 46,730, paying customs duty of Rs. 72,48,875/-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demurrage and Wharfage Charges by Port Trust — Holds Customs Detention Not Attributable to Exporter for Demurrage Liability. The court quashed the demand for demurrage and wharfage charges against the exporter and directed the Customs authorities to pay the amount to the Port Trust.

29 Mar 2006

The petitioners, Vidyt Metallics Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition challenging the orders dated 17.12.1998 and 29.12.1998 and the demand dated 8...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Act Case — Master of Vessel Solely Liable for Import Manifest Errors. Agents Filing Manifest on Behalf of Master Not Liable Under Sections 30 and 148(2) of Customs Act, 1962.

5 Apr 2006

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports) against M/s Patvolk and M/s Shahi Containers. The dispute arose from the arrival ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Seeking Reassessment of Customs Duty Due to Typographical Error in Customs Tariff Heading. Petitioner's Inadvertent Error in Declaring CTH 85176990 Instead of 85176930 for Routers Entitles Correction Under Customs Act, 1962.

18 Jan 2021

The petitioner, Dimension Data India Private Ltd., an importer, filed five Bills of Entry between 15.03.2019 and 25.04.2019 for importing 48 units of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations and Demand for Customs Duty in Sugar Export Cases. Non-compliance with export obligation due to government-imposed export ban constitutes force majeure, and demand for duty with interest cannot be sustained.

20 Apr 2026

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by companies engaged in sugar trading and export, challenging the cancellation of advance authorizatio...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)