Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Petition Against Interest Demand on Differential Customs Duty for Goods Imported Prior to Introduction of Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962. The Court held that interest under Section 28AA cannot be levied retrospectively for imports completed in 1986-1987.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 74
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Union of India, through the Controller of Stores, Central Railway, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 5 July 2006 and subsequent demand notices issued by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, claiming differential duty and interest. The petitioner had already paid the differential duty but contested the interest component. The goods in question were imported by the Railways in 1986-1987 under the Project Import Regulations, 1986, and were provisionally assessed to customs duty under heading 9801 with concessional rates. The final assessment was made in 2006, and the differential duty was paid. The petitioner argued that at the time of import, there was no provision for interest on delayed payment of duty under the Customs Act, 1962. Section 28AA, which provides for such interest, was introduced by the Finance Act, 1995, with effect from 26 May 1995. Since the import was completed in 1986-1987, the petitioner contended that no interest could be charged. The respondent Commissioner argued that interest was payable from the date of final assessment. The Court, relying on the decision in Commissioner of Central Excise v. Dev Ashish, held that Section 28AA does not have retrospective effect and cannot apply to imports completed before its enactment. The Court allowed the petition, quashing the demand for interest.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Interest on Delayed Payment of Duty - Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Retrospective Operation - The issue was whether interest could be charged on differential duty for goods imported in 1986-1987, before Section 28AA was introduced with effect from 26 May 1995. The Court held that since the import was completed prior to the enactment of the provision, no interest could be levied, as the provision does not have retrospective effect. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether interest on delayed payment of differential customs duty can be levied under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, in respect of goods imported in 1986-1987, i.e., prior to the introduction of the said provision.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The demand for interest on differential duty is quashed.

Law Points

  • Interest on delayed payment of customs duty cannot be charged for imports completed before the enactment of Section 28AA of the Customs Act
  • 1962
  • which was introduced with effect from 26 May 1995 by the Finance Act
  • 1995.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (08) 73

WRIT PETITION NO.14417 OF 2018

2019-08-09

M.S. Sanklecha, S.C. Gupte

Mr.R.V. Desai, Senior Counsel a/w Mr.T.J. Pandian for the Petitioner; Mr.Vijay Kantharia a/w Mr.Ram Ochani for the Respondents

Union of India

The Commissioner of Customs (ImportI) & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging demand for interest on differential customs duty.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of demand notices for interest on differential duty.

Filing Reason

The Commissioner of Customs claimed interest on differential duty for goods imported in 1986-1987, which the petitioner contended was not payable as Section 28AA was introduced later.

Previous Decisions

Order-in-original dated 5 July 2006 assessing differential duty and demanding interest.

Issues

Whether interest under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962 can be levied on differential duty for goods imported prior to the introduction of the provision.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: The import was completed in 1986-1987, before Section 28AA was introduced in 1995; hence no interest can be charged. Relied on Commissioner of Central Excise v. Dev Ashish. Respondent: Interest is payable from the date of final assessment in 2006.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, which provides for interest on delayed payment of duty, does not have retrospective effect and cannot apply to imports completed before its enactment on 26 May 1995.

Judgment Excerpts

The chief contention of the petitionerUnion is that the subject goods were imported by the Railways in 19861987 under the Project Import Regulations, 1986. Section 28AA of the Customs Act, which provides for interest on delayed payment of duty, was introduced by the Finance Act, 1995, viz Act 22 of 1995, with effect from 26th May 1995. Since the import of the subject goods has been fully accomplished as far back as in 19861987, there is no scope for charging any interest on delayed payment of duty.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay challenging the order-in-original dated 5 July 2006 and demand notices for interest on differential customs duty. The petition was heard and decided on 9 August 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962: Section 28AA
  • Finance Act, 1995: Act 22 of 1995
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Service Tax Case: No Time Limit for Stay Application Before Commissioner (Appeals) Under Finance Act, 1994. Tribunal erred in dismissing appeal solely on ground of delay in filing stay application when stay applicat...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Petition Against Interest Demand on Differential Customs Duty for Goods Imported Prior to Introduction of Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962. The Court held that interest under Section 28AA cannot be levied re...