Search Results for "Court Award"

9716 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9716 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtors' Writ Petitions Challenging Attachment in Execution of Foreign Decree. Court Holds That Objections Under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC Must Be Raised Before Executing Court, Not by Writ Petition.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by judgment debtors challenging the attachment of their property in execution of a foreign decree. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Challenging High Court’s Order Dismissing Absorption Claims of Temporary LIC Workers. The Court interprets the compromise reached in earlier SLP and the distinction between absorption and recruitment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

This group of civil appeals by various employee associations challenged the Delhi High Court's common judgment dismissing their appeals and affirming ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Reduces Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that mere potentiality of land for non-agricultural use does not justify compensation at rates comparable to developed plots without evidence of comparable sales.

The case involves multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for a housing scheme under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application in Arbitration Dispute Over Barge Sale Agreement. Jurisdictional Objection Must Be Decided Before Granting or Refusing Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s. Prince Marine Transport Services Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners to Obtain Commission to Singapore Under Section 27 of Arbitration Act. Issuing Commission to Foreign Country Does Not Amount to Change of Venue of Arbitration.

The petition was filed under section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the two petitioners, who were the original respondents in the...