Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

332 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 332 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Labelling Activity Does Not Amount to Manufacture Under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Additional labelling on already marketable goods without enhancing marketability does not constitute manufacture, and extended period of limitation is applicable due to suppression of facts.

30 Apr 2024

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against an order of CESTAT which allowed the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification Disputes — Laminated Tubes and Printed Cartons Classified as Printed Matter Under Chapter 49. The court held that no substantial question of law arose as the classification was a question of fact determined by the Tribunal based on evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed multiple appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the common order of the Cus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Partnership Firm and Partner Against Penalty Under Customs Act — Double Jeopardy Plea Rejected. Penalty on firm and partner under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is permissible as firm is a separate entity for penalty purposes.

6 Jul 2011

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 12 February 2004, which reduced penalties impo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals Under Section 58 of RERA Act Against Orders of Adjudicating Officer and Goa RERA. Maintainability of Second Appeal Under RERA Act Questioned - Held That Section 58 of RERA Act Does Not Provide for a Second Appeal to the High Court Against Orders of the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal.

12 Jan 2023

The appellant, Adam A. Jumma, proprietor of Aman Builders and Developers, Goa, filed two second appeals under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Waiving Late Fees for Delayed Bill of Entry Filing. Late Fee Under Section 46(3) of Customs Act, 1962 Is Mandatory and Not Discretionary for Delayed Filing Beyond Prescribed Period.

26 Jul 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Customs, Pune, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the final order of the Customs, Excise...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exemption Under Notification No.223/88.

24 Aug 2010

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Rajkumar Forge Limited and its director challenging orders of the Commissioner of Central...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals on Interest on Refund Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Interest Payable from Expiry of Three Months from Date of Initial Refund Claim, Not from Date of Tribunal Order. The court followed the Supreme Court decision in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. UoI, holding that the date of initial refund claim is the relevant date for computing interest under Section 11BB.

2 Dec 2022

The appellant, Lavino Kapur Cotton Pvt. Ltd., filed four refund applications under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, for refund of duty amounti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeal in Purification Activity Case — Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Judicial Indiscipline. Purification of excise duty paid goods on job work basis does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Tribunal bound by precedents.

20 Jan 2015

The Bombay High Court disposed of Central Excise Appeal No.179 of 2014 and Civil Writ Petition No.279 of 2015 by a common order. The appellant, Sunbel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet Food Bags Classifiable Under CTH 2309.90.10. The court held that the product 'Pet Food' imported in bulk bags of 20 kgs is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 2309.90.10 as 'other preparations of a kind used in animal feeding' and not under CTH 2309.90.90.

22 Jul 2026

The appellant, M/s. Orange Pet Nutrition Private Limited, filed an appeal under Section 28KA of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging an advance ruling o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Union of India in Customs Gold Confiscation Case — Confessional Statements Under Section 108 of Customs Act, 1962 Are Admissible Evidence and Cannot Be Discarded Without Proof of Coercion.

16 Oct 2018

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India and the Commissioner of Customs (Prev.) against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)