Search Results for "Attesting Witness"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Concurrent Findings of Ownership Based on Will Upheld. Court holds that concurrent findings of fact cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC unless perverse or based on no evidence.

The Regular Second Appeal was filed by the defendant-appellant against the concurrent judgment and decree of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Protecting the Rights of the Appellant: Court Rules Against Bonafide Purchasers in the Doctrine of Lis Pendens Case. Rejection of Defence and Upholding of Decree in a Property Dispute

The proceedings and judgment of an appeal filed before a court, challenging a judgment and order passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court on 03.10....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert, and Suit Property Not Identified.

The appellant, M/s. Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC against the judgment and decree dated 30.04.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine and Enforceable Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Discrepancies in Pleadings.

The appellant, Harish, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 05.12.2008 allegedly executed by the respondents in his fav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court's Refusal to Allow Additional Documents in Eviction Suit — No Error in Exercise of Discretion Under Order 13 Rule 1 CPC.

The petitioners, as plaintiffs in a suit for eviction, sued two defendants. The second defendant, during his cross-examination, applied to produce cer...