High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "1894"
1742 result(s) found
Found 1742 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.
1 Aug 2026The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case with Modified Compensation Directions. Deemed acquisition date set as 17.05.1996 under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with compensation based on market price at that time but no interest for delay period.
24 Feb 2023The dispute arose from the State of Himachal Pradesh's use of private land for constructing a road from Banuti to Pahal in 1996 without formal acquisi...
- 388
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for MRTS Project — High Court Direction for Alternate Site Quashed. Court holds that once acquisition is complete and possession taken, no direction for alternate site can be issued under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
1 Jul 2019The case involves appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against a common judgment of the Madras High Court directing allotment of alternate land to priva...
- 227
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.
10 Mar 2016The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Land Owner's Right to Insist on Acquisition under Section 126 MRTP Act After Town Planning Scheme Reservation. The Court frames the legal issue regarding the interrelationship between Chapters V and VII of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 in the context of land reserved for public purposes.
1 Aug 2026The appeal arose from a dispute regarding a plot of land reserved for Municipal Office in a Town Planning Scheme under the Maharashtra Regional and To...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.
15 Dec 2016The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...
- 113
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Govt. of NCT of Delhi in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Deemed Not Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Possession Taken in 1983, Compensation Not Tendered, but Twin Conditions of Possession and Compensation Must Both Be Unsatisfied for Lapse.
15 Dec 2022The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the Delhi High Court's judgment dated 01.12.2015 in Writ Petition (C) No.27 of 2015, which declared th...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award — Petitioners Fail to Establish Entitlement to Higher Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the Reference Court's findings on market value based on evidence cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction unless perverse.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a writ petition filed by seven individuals (petitioners) against the State of Goa, the Land Acquisition Officer, and eight private r...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Challenge to Acquisition for Waghur Project Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' acceptance of compensation without protest for nearly 20 years bars them from challenging the acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
7 Oct 2015The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for the Waghur Project in Jalgaon, Maharashtra...
- 36
