Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

3323 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3323 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India in Jurisdictional Dispute Over Trial of IBC Offences. Held that Reference to Special Court under Chapter XXVIII of Companies Act, 2013 in Section 236(1) IBC is Legislation by Incorporation, Not Affected by Subsequent Amendment.

The appeal arises from a challenge by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court quashing the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Construction and Nuisance. Tenant's unauthorized permanent alterations and nuisance to other occupants justified eviction under Bombay Rent Act.

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute where the landlord filed a suit for eviction of the tenant from the suit premises under Sections 12 and 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 21(c), 23(c) read with 28 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of contraband beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Daughter's Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition Challenging Father's Marriage Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Family Court Erred in Holding That Earlier Suit for Declaration of Marriage as Void Was Barred by Res Judicata as Cause of Action Was Different.

The appellant, Mrs. Nayana M. Ramani, is the married daughter of late Mr. Navnitlal R. Shah. The respondent, Mrs. Fizzah Navnitlal Shah, claims to hav...