Search Results for "invalid application"

4017 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4017 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Examines Constitutional Validity of Consumer Protection Rules 2020 on Selection Committee and Tenure. Advocate and Sitting District Commission Members Challenge Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2) Alleging Violation of Separation of Powers and Seeking Re-Appointment Eligibility.

These three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Rajasthan VAT Exemption Notification for Fly Ash-Based Asbestos Cement Products. Article 304(a) Discrimination Challenge Pertains to Exemption Available Only to Manufacturers in Rajasthan Under Section 8(3) of Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

The appeals before the Supreme Court of India arose from three writ petitions dismissed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.

This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Renewal of Trademarks Despite Delay, Directs Registrar to Accept Applications. Court holds that failure to issue notice under Section 25(3) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 before removal of marks from register renders removal invalid, and marks must be treated as continuing on register.

The petitioner, Motwane Private Ltd., had registered three trade marks under Nos. 312470, 312472, and 312473, which were renewed up to 17 February 198...