Search Results for "criminal trial standard"

1956 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1956 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Ishwarbhai Narayan Makwana, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for the murder of Raji under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder, Kidnapping, and Unnatural Offense Case. Circumstantial evidence including last seen together and recovery of body at instance of accused sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302, 363, 377, 201 IPC.

The appellant, Vaibhav Shantaram More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai, for offenses under Sections 363, 377, 302, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court held that Section 308(7) BNS requires specific intent to cause death, which was absent as injuries were simple and on non-vital parts.

The applicants, Vikas Rajput and Dilip Gavit, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking release in c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Were Inconsistent and Lacked Corroboration.

The appellant, Anil Laxman Hichami, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for the murder of the deceased under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Baliram s/o Mansingh Chawhan, a Police Head Constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case No. 3/1998 for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Rajaram Thaokar, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 25/1991 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside

The appellant, Chandrakant @ Chavhan s/o Deorao Bhujade, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case — Mineral Oil as Foreign Matter Must Exceed 3% Limit Under Rule 44AAA. Clause A.05.17 of Appendix B to Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 permits extraneous matter up to 3% by weight, and mineral oil falls within that category.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Mangala Badkhal, proprietor of M/s. Sweta Spices Industries, for of...