Search Results for "civil suit dismissal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "civil suit dismissal"

4060 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4060 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether GlaxoSmithKline Decision on Territorial Jurisdiction Stands Overruled by Supreme Court. Issue Pertains to Determination of Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour/Industrial Courts Under MRTU Act When Employees Are Posted Outside Maharashtra But Employer's Office Is Within State.

3 Nov 2025

The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters comprising Appeal No. 585 of 2009 and several connected writ petitions. The core dispute centered on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Examines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts under MRTU Act Amidst Conflict with Supreme Court Precedents. The Court Considers Whether the Decision in GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Abhay Raj Jain Stands Impliedly Overruled by Nandram v. Garware Polyester Limited and Rakesh Kumar Verma v. HDFC Bank Ltd. for Determining Cause of Action in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints.

3 Nov 2025

This judgment deals with a batch of appeals and writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay involving a common question of territoria...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Determines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts Under MRTU Act for Employees Outside Maharashtra. The Court considers whether the principle that situs of employee determines jurisdiction (GlaxoSmithKline) is overruled by subsequent Supreme Court rulings.

3 Nov 2025

The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters, including Appeal No.585 of 2009 and several writ petitions, involving employees and trade unions fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Revision Applications for Enhanced Compensation — Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable on Solatium and Additional Amount.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves multiple Civil Revision Applications filed by land owners whose lands were acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Swarna Proje...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery of Money Suit — Limitation Period for Refund of Advance Under Agreement to Sell Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, Not Article 24. Agreement to Sell Not a Bond, Hence Article 24 Inapplicable; Suit Filed Within Three Years from Date of Refusal to Execute Sale Deed Is Within Limitation.

29 Apr 2025

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for recovery of money seeking refund of an advance amount of Rs. 5,00,000 paid to the respondent-def...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Section 9 Application for Injunction. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement and prima facie case for interim relief must be considered at the stage of Section 9 application, and the trial court erred in dismissing the application without considering the merits.

2 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s Equestrain Centre for Excellence, filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Legal Heirship Certificate Case Under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 — Holds That Objections Based on Title to Property Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings for Heirship Certificate. The court set aside the dismissal of the application and remanded the matter for fresh consideration limited to the question of legal heirship.

3 Oct 2023

The appellant, Yusufunissabegum @ Fauzia Tanvir, filed an application under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 seeking a legal heirship certificate in res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Court held that revisional jurisdiction is limited to jurisdictional errors and cannot be used to re-appreciate evidence or correct erroneous findings of fact.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Madhav Sheshadri Kulkarni against the dismissal of his suit for declaration and injunction. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed by Father Not Binding on Sons as Legal Necessity Not Proved. Court sets aside concurrent findings of courts below, holding that burden to prove legal necessity for sale by father as karta of joint family was not discharged by purchaser.

28 Jul 2010

The present second appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 20.4.1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Khamgaon in Regular Civil Appeal N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Application to Reject Suit Due to Arbitration Clause in Commercial Summary Suit. Dispute Referred to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Dec 2023

The Plaintiff, M/s Railsys Engineers Private Ltd., filed a commercial summary suit against the Defendants, Overseas Infrastructure Alliance Pvt. Ltd. ...

168 169 170 171 172

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)