Search Results for "specific overt acts"

325 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 325 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused No.2 in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Petitioner's Liability Under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC Not Established as Complaint Failed to Attribute Any Overt Act or Criminal Intent.

The petitioner, Rajesh Yallappa Totaganti, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Compromise Between Spouses — Settlement Reached Through Mediation, No Prima Facie Case for Cruelty Under Section 498-A IPC.

The applicants, who are the husband and his relatives, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking q...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Compromise Between Spouses. The court held that where parties have settled their differences and are living together, continuing prosecution under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC would be an abuse of process of law.

The applicants, who are the husband, in-laws, and sister-in-law of the complainant, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Spouses. Criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC quashed as parties amicably resolved disputes and complainant expressed no objection.

The applicants, who were the original accused, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking to qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that vague allegations against in-laws and lack of jurisdiction at Degloor warranted quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicants, who are the husband and in-laws of the complainant, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Compromise Between Spouses — Settlement Reached Before Charge Sheet, Court Finds No Public Interest in Continuing Prosecution Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

The applicants, who are the husband and his relatives, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Striking of Election Petition Paragraphs in Municipal Election Dispute. Court upholds that vague allegations of corrupt practices without specific details of consent by the returned candidate are liable to be struck off under Order VI Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioner, Eknath Bayaji Gadkari, filed an election petition under Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenging the e...