High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused No.2 in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Petitioner's Liability Under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC Not Established as Complaint Failed to Attribute Any Overt Act or Criminal Intent.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 183
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rajesh Yallappa Totaganti, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of the entire criminal proceedings in C.C. No.804/2022 pending before the Additional Civil Judge and II Additional JMFC Court, Ranebennur, and the order of cognizance dated 20.09.2022. The petitioner was arrayed as accused No.2 in the case, which was initiated based on a private complaint filed by the second respondent (complainant) on 07.10.2015 against three accused for offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The complainant alleged that the accused had cheated him by creating false documents. However, the complaint did not contain any specific allegations against the petitioner. The only reference to the petitioner was that he was a relative of accused No.1. No overt act or criminal intent was attributed to the petitioner. The High Court, after hearing the counsel for the petitioner and the State, found that the complaint lacked specific allegations against the petitioner. The court held that continuing the proceedings against the petitioner would be an abuse of the process of law. Consequently, the petition was allowed, and the entire criminal proceedings against the petitioner in C.C. No.804/2022 were quashed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Proceedings - Section 482 CrPC - Lack of Specific Allegations - Complaint against three accused for cheating and forgery - Petitioner/accused No.2 was not specifically named in the complaint except as a relative of accused No.1 - No overt act or criminal intent attributed to petitioner - Held that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law, proceedings quashed (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.2 in C.C. No.804/2022 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 read with Section 34 IPC should be quashed for lack of specific allegations.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The entire criminal proceedings against the petitioner in C.C. No.804/2022 pending on the file of Additional Civil Judge and II Additional JMFC Court, Ranebennur, and the order of cognizance dated 20.09.2022 are quashed.

Law Points

  • Criminal proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC if the complaint does not disclose any specific overt act or criminal intent against the accused
  • mere mention of name in complaint is insufficient to sustain charges of cheating and forgery
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (09) 7

CRL.P No. 100659 of 2023

2023-09-14

M. Nagaprasanna

Smt. Pooja Savadatti, Shri R.H. Angadi, Shri V.S. Kalasurmath

Rajesh S/o Yallappa Totaganti

State of Karnataka (Ranebennur Town Police Station) and Manjappa Adopted S/o. Mardieppa Kambli

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C. No.804/2022 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 read with Section 34 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner/accused No.2 sought quashing of the entire criminal proceedings and the order of cognizance dated 20.09.2022 passed by the Additional Civil Judge and II Additional JMFC Court, Ranebennur.

Filing Reason

The petitioner was arrayed as accused No.2 in a private complaint filed by the second respondent alleging cheating and forgery, but the complaint did not contain any specific allegations against the petitioner.

Previous Decisions

The trial court took cognizance of the offences on 20.09.2022.

Issues

Whether the criminal proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.2 should be quashed for lack of specific allegations.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the complaint does not contain any specific allegations against him and that he is only a relative of accused No.1. State opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Criminal proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC if the complaint does not disclose any specific overt act or criminal intent against the accused, as continuing such proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.

Judgment Excerpts

The complaint does not contain any specific allegations against the petitioner except that he is a relative of accused No.1. Continuing the proceedings against the petitioner would be an abuse of the process of law.

Procedural History

The second respondent filed a private complaint on 07.10.2015 against three accused. The trial court took cognizance on 20.09.2022. The petitioner, accused No.2, filed this petition under Section 482 CrPC on 14.09.2023 seeking quashing.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Property Survey with Police Protection. Direction Issued to Conduct Scheduled Survey and to Provide Police Assistance if Necessary.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.