Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Spouses. Criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC quashed as parties amicably resolved disputes and complainant expressed no objection.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 77
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, who were the original accused, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking to quash the First Information Report (FIR) bearing Crime No. 133 of 2018 registered at Shivajinagar Police Station, Nanded, for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), as well as the subsequent criminal proceeding bearing Regular Criminal Case No. 698 of 2018 (Charge-sheet No. 90 of 2018). The FIR was lodged by the complainant, Yogini Yogesh Kumbharkar, on 24-06-2018, alleging that the applicants, who were her husband and in-laws, subjected her to cruelty and harassment for dowry. During the pendency of the application, the parties arrived at an amicable settlement. The complainant, respondent No. 2, appeared before the Court and stated that she had settled the dispute with the applicants and had no objection to the quashing of the FIR and criminal proceedings. The Court, after hearing the parties and considering the settlement, held that since the dispute was essentially matrimonial in nature and the parties had resolved their differences, continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the Court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Inherent Powers - Settlement - Matrimonial Dispute - The applicants sought quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute. The Court, considering the settlement and the complainant's no objection, held that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law and quashed the FIR and proceedings. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the basis of a settlement between the complainant and accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the application and quashed the FIR bearing Crime No. 133 of 2018 and the criminal proceeding bearing Regular Criminal Case No. 698 of 2018.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
  • Settlement between parties
  • Non-compoundable offences
  • Compromise in matrimonial disputes
  • Inherent powers of High Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (08) 44

Criminal Application No. 3838 of 2018

2019-08-08

T.V. Nalawade, K.K. Sonawane

Mr. B.G. Deshmukh for applicants, Mr. A.S. Shinde APP for respondent No. 1-State, Mr. S.D. Tanbad for Respondent No. 2

Yogesh S/o Digambar Kumbharkar and others

The State of Maharashtra and Yogini Yogesh Kumbharkar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Applicants (original accused) sought quashing of FIR No. 133/2018 and Regular Criminal Case No. 698/2018.

Filing Reason

Allegations of cruelty and harassment under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC.

Issues

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the basis of a settlement between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that the dispute was amicably settled with the complainant. Complainant (respondent No. 2) stated that she had no objection to the quashing of the FIR and proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

When the parties in a matrimonial dispute have amicably settled their differences and the complainant has no objection, continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, and the High Court can exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR and proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The applicants - original accused preferred present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“Cr.P.C.”) seeking relief to quash and set aside the First Information Report (“FIR”) bearing Crime No. 133 of 2018... It has been alleged on behalf of prosecution that the first informant – complainant Yogini Yogesh Kumbharkar, on 24-06-2018 approached...

Procedural History

FIR registered on 24-06-2018; charge-sheet filed as Regular Criminal Case No. 698 of 2018; applicants filed Criminal Application No. 3838 of 2018 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing; parties settled; Court allowed quashing on 08-08-2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Spouses. Criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC quashed as parties amicably resolved disputes and complainant expressed no objection.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Multiplier Corrected from 13 to 14 for Deceased Aged 51. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation of Rs.3,45,500/- with interest at 6% per annum under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.