KAHC030001822015_1
9 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, where the appellant, a Commercial Tax Officer, was convicted by the S...
Search Results for "special purpose vehicle"
1313 result(s) found
Found 1313 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Minor Injured in Motorcycle Accident, Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Liability. The court held that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was inadequate and enhanced it from Rs.65,000 to Rs.1,00,000, affirming the liability of the insurer under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
10 Aug 2017The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Belagavi in MVC No.1654/2009. The claima...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal on Quantum in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Cannot Challenge Quantum Without Leave Under Section 170 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Leave Under Section 170 Cannot Be Granted for the First Time in Appeal When Insurer Failed to Seek It Before the Tribunal.
29 Apr 2011The case involves an appeal by United India Assurance Co. Ltd., the insurer, against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ali...
- 99
High Court
High Court Dismisses/Allows Appeals in Motor Accident Claims Cases, Applying MV Act Section 173(1). Multiple Insurance Companies Challenge MACT Awards; Court's Final Direction Not Stated.
22 Dec 2020This is a batch of appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench against var...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Truck Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Proved. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation with 6% interest per annum from date of petition.
6 Nov 2023The judgment arises from two cross-appeals against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli, dated 28 September 2005 in Claim Petition ...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Compensation Award for Traumatic Amputation. The Tribunal's assessment of 70% disability and award of Rs.5,02,600 under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was upheld as just and proper.
19 Mar 2019The case involves an appeal by the insurance company against an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, granting compensation to the clai...
- 108
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Multiplier Applied as Per Age of Injured Person, Not the Age of Parents. The Court recalculated loss of future income using multiplier 17 and enhanced total compensation from Rs. 1,67,000 to Rs. 2,57,600 under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
12 Jan 2018The appellant, Kumari Shanta, a 27-year-old private teacher, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compens...
- 89
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal of Minor Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Negligence Apportionment Set Aside, Compensation Enhanced. The court held that a pillion rider cannot be attributed contributory negligence and enhanced compensation from Rs. 2,52,000 to Rs. 4,00,000 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
25 Mar 2026The present appeal was filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the original claimant, a minor represented through his natural guar...
- 136
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Regulatory Framework for Aggregator Licensing Under Motor Vehicles Act - Guidelines Not Mandatory for State Governments. The Court held that Central Government's Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines 2020 have persuasive value but are not binding on State Governments when granting licenses under Section 93 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, as the proviso uses permissive language 'may follow' and ultimate discretion rests with States.
7 Feb 2023The Supreme Court addressed petitions challenging the validity of a notification issued by the State of Maharashtra and related judgments of the Bomba...
- 593
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Challenge to Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Ruling in Concession Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Not Binding on Consortium Members as They Were Not Signatories to the Concession Agreement.
1 Mar 2018The petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, a major port constituted under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, issued a glo...
- 113
