Search Results for "single point tax"

1496 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1496 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Regarding Retrospective Reassessment of Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Single Judge had Quashed Orders and Demands Reassessing Rateable Value from 1-4-2000.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai issued special notices in 2001 and 2002 reassessing the rateable value of Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals as Not Maintainable in Service Tax Refund Case. The issue of refund under notifications granting exemption for services consumed in SEZ relates to rate of duty, thus appeal lies to Supreme Court under Section 35G(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune (Revenue) against an order dated 28th March 2013 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Input Tax Credit Under KVAT Act. Interpretation of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Availment of Input Tax Credit Irrespective of Invoice Month Framed the Core Issue.

A batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by various companies including...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows NDMC Appeals in Property Tax Dispute — Upholds Unit Area Method as Valid. The impugned Bye-laws are not ultra vires the NDMC Act, 1994, as they fall within the rule-making power under Section 388 and are consistent with Section 63.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) against the Delhi High Court judgment dated August 10, 2017, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of State Government Undertaking Against Tax Assessment Orders. Exemption Notification Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Held Applicable to Buses Operated on All India Tourist Permits.

The Andhra Pradesh Tourist Development Corporation (APTDC), a State Government undertaking, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...