Search Results for "retrospective recovery"

292 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 292 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes HAL Circular Re-fixing Pay Notionally from 2017 — Violation of Natural Justice and Article 14. Employer's Unilateral Re-fixation of Pay Without Hearing Employees Held Arbitrary and Unenforceable.

The petitioner, Hindustan Aeronautics Officers Guild (HAOG), representing officers of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), filed a writ petition under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cenvat Credit Interest Dispute — Reversal Without Utilization Does Not Attract Interest. Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 interpreted to require actual utilization for interest liability.

The appellant, Cipla Limited, a manufacturer of medicaments, was engaged in the manufacture of medicaments containing ethanol (alcohol) which fell out...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MIDC's Demand for Service Charges at Allegedly Agreed Rate. Service charges must be based on statutory notification under Section 14 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, not private negotiation.

The petitioner, Federation of Association of Industries, through its President Shyamsundar Vasudev Agrawal, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Gratuity Recovery Orders Against Municipal Corporation Employees. Gratuity Act Section 7(4-A) Recovery Not Barred by Limitation Act; Employer's Failure to Deposit Amount Attracts Interest.

The petitioners, former employees of the Hubli-Dharwad Municipal Corporation, challenged the recovery orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner and App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Over Sublease Agreement Dispute. Part of Cause of Action Arose in Mumbai Where Agreement Was Executed and Defendant's Office Located.

The applicant, Diamond & Gem Development Corporation Limited, was the original defendant No.1 in Short Cause Suit No.818 of 2011 filed by respondent N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...