Search Results for "retrospective exemption"

271 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 271 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in PMLA Default Bail Case — BNSS Proviso Not Retrospective. Complaint Filed Before BNSS Commencement Governed by Old Law; No Default Bail as Complaint Filed Within 60 Days of Arrest.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Uttarakhand High Court's order rejecting default bail to the appellant, Parvinder Singh, in a money ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition and Income Tax Appeal for Non-Prosecution Due to Repeated Absence. Petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearings, leading to dismissal for default under Order 17 Rule 2 CPC read with Section 151 CPC.

The petitioner, Vaibhav Maruti Dombale, filed a Writ Petition (No. 1489 of 2025) and an Income Tax Appeal (No. 21746 of 2025) before the Bombay High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Sales Promotion and Physician Sample Expenses is Invalid.

The petitioner, Abbott India Limited (successor of Solvay Pharma India Ltd.), challenged a notice dated 27 March 2015 issued under Section 148 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...