Search Results for "reopening after four years"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-UG 2024 Exam Integrity, Finds No Systemic Leak or Malpractice. Court dismisses petitions for re-test, holding that isolated irregularities do not warrant cancellation of the entire examination under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India dismissed a batch of petitions seeking cancellation and re-conduct of the NEET-UG 2024 examination, which was held on 5 May...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Valid Approval Under Section 151. Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Six Years Without Proper Sanction from Specified Authority Held Invalid.

The petitioner, Vibrant Securities Pvt. Ltd., a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange, challenged a reassessment notice date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Reassessment Notice Invalid Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure. Arbitration Award Receipt Held as Capital Receipt, Not Income Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Ramona Pinto, an individual, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order dated 2nd April 2018 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Capital Gains Computation is Invalid.

The petitioners, A&J Associates (a partnership firm) and its partner Ajay Dilkhush Sarupria, challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment After Four Years Invalid as Assessee Had Made Full Disclosure During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd., challenged a notice dated 28 March 2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tax Appeal in Family Settlement Capital Gains Case — Reopening Under Section 147/148 Invalid Due to Change of Opinion and Limitation. Consent Decree Approved by Civil Court Held to Be a Bona Fide Family Arrangement Not Attracting Capital Gains Tax.

The case involves a tax appeal by the Power of Attorney holder of Lorna Margaret Pinto, a Non-Resident Indian, against the Assistant Commissioner of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Full and True Disclosure. Assessee's Claim for Deduction Under Section 80-IA Was Considered During Original Assessment, Hence No Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Titanor Components Limited, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenged a notice issued under Section 147 of the Act for re...