Search Results for "presiding officer absence"

1027 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1027 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assignee's Challenge to Auction Sale for Non-Compliance with Regulation 37(1) of DRT Regulations, 2015 — Failure to Raise Objection at Appropriate Stage and Lack of Prejudice Renders Challenge Belated and Unsubstantiated.

The petitioner, Invest Assets Securitisations & Reconstruction Private Limited, an assignee holding a pari passu charge with the first respondent Bank...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Waqf Tribunal's Interim Order in Property Dispute. The Revision Application Raised Jurisdictional Question Regarding the Competence of a Single-Member Tribunal After the 2013 Amendment to the Waqf Act, Without a Transitory Provision.

The case arose from a civil revision under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995, filed by the original defendants (Magnum Developers and others) challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Workman for Slapping Superior Officer in HPCL Case. Physical assault on superior constitutes grave misconduct warranting dismissal, and Tribunal's reduction of punishment to stoppage of one increment is perverse and shocks judicial conscience.

The case involves cross petitions by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) and its workman, Mavji Jethalal Rathod, challenging an Award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Declaration of Perverse Findings in Disciplinary Enquiry. Labour Court's Power to Reappreciate Evidence Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Upheld Where Enquiry Findings Are Not Supported by Evidence.

The petitioner, Tata Infomedia Limited (formerly Tata Press Limited), challenged an order of the Labour Court at Mumbai dated 23rd October 2001. The L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Passes Judgment in Multiple Motor Accident Claim Appeals

...