Search Results for "ownership period"

3062 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3062 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment in Suits for Declaration, Injunction, Partition, and Dissolution of Partnership — Property Dispute Involving Sites in Mysore and Bangalore

The Regular First Appeals RFA No.37/2003 and RFA No.84/2003 were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the common j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 499 OF 2012

The appeal before the High Court arose out of an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissing the assessee's appeal and upholdi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitrator’s Interim Order in Film Remake Rights Case. Dispute Involves Enforcement of Agreement Dated 24 January 2012 Granting Remake Rights of Film 'Zanjeer' and Payment of Instalments.

The petition was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim order dated 16 July 2012 passed by the l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Revenue's Wealth Tax Appeals Involving Definition of 'Assets'. The Appeals Challenge ITAT Orders Regarding Assessment Years 1999-2000 to 2004-05 under Section 2(ea) of Wealth Tax Act, 1957.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of Wealth Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 27-A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...