WRIT PETITION NO. 5634 OF 2014
30 Oct 2015Three writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a group of workers, including Aayas and Ward Boys, challenging the c...
Search Results for "ouster clause"
260 result(s) found
Found 260 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.
20 Jan 2015The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...
- 129
High Court
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Reservation of Wards in Municipal Elections. Petitioners Allege Arbitrary Change from Draft to Final Notification Affecting Candidacy Rights.
14 Jan 2019Background: Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds that a co-owner can sue for possession without impleading other co-owners and that adverse possession cannot be claimed against a co-owner.
4 Dec 2018The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court in a su...
- 105
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Hears Second Appeal Challenging Partial Decree in Partition Suit — Appellants Argue Suit Barred by Limitation Due to Revenue Entry Mutation in 1983.
20 Mar 2026The matter arose from a suit filed by daughters of deceased Kachraji Aataji claiming partition of ancestral properties, specifically land bearing surv...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Scheme of Amalgamation Without Physical Meeting in Exceptional Circumstances. Section 110 of Companies Act, 2013 Does Not Eliminate Requirement of Meeting Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956 for Scheme Approval.
8 May 2014The judgment addresses a Company Summons for Direction filed by Godrej Industries Limited (GIL) seeking approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation with Wada...
- 186
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay of Over 12 Years in Filing Appeal — No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay. The court held that the applicant's explanation for the delay was not credible and that the applicant had failed to show sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
10 Mar 2023The Bombay High Court dismissed an application for condonation of delay of over 12 years in filing an appeal. The applicant, Islamic Republic of Iran ...
- 157
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent.
16 Apr 2015The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 12.4.2005 passed by the First Additional ...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order on Court Fee Valuation in Partition Suit — Suit Properly Valued Under Section 35(2) of Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.
20 Feb 2018The petitioners, defendant Nos. 3 and 4 in a partition suit (O.S. No. 53/2010) pending before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Udupi, filed a writ pe...
- 47
