Search Results for "option modification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "option modification"

328 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Debarment from Examination Due to Attendance Shortfall. Court Refuses to Interfere with Educational Institution's Attendance Policy Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Holding That Minimum Attendance Requirement Is a Valid Academic Criterion.

30 Jun 2026

The petitioner, a student, challenged the decision of the respondent educational institution debarring him from appearing in examinations due to failu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Encroachment — High Court's Modification of Trial Decree Set Aside. The Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by modifying a concurrent finding of encroachment without framing a substantial question of law.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, legal heirs of the original plaintiff Om Parkash, filed Civil Suit No.426 of 1996 seeking mandatory injunction for removal of an alleg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows HDFC Bank's Petition Against DRAT Remand Order in Debt Recovery Dispute. Court holds that DRAT failed to exercise jurisdiction by remanding the matter to DRT without deciding the issue of whether HDFC's claim constitutes a 'debt' under Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

20 Feb 2025

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions arising from a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 26 April 2024. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Jurisdiction for Section 34 Challenge to MSMED Act Award Is Governed by Section 18(4) of MSMED Act, Not by Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement. The non obstante provision in Section 18(4) overrides the arbitration agreement, and the Section 34 petition must be filed at the place where the supplier is located.

16 Oct 2024

The case involves a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge decisions regarding the jurisd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Compassionate Appointment for Heirs of Employee Retired on Invalid Pension. Rule 80 Retirement and Exclusionary G.R. Held Arbitrary and Unconstitutional.

24 Oct 2018

The case involves a challenge by the State of Maharashtra against an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) allowing the original appl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Injunction in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement. Court holds that disputes regarding termination of a development agreement are arbitrable and that interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when the agreement itself provides for termination and the petitioner has an adequate remedy under the arbitration clause.

2 May 2017

The petitioner, B.E. Billimoria & Company Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an injunctio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Revision Under Section 115 CPC Not Maintainable Against Small Causes Court Decree Under Section 26A of Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887; Writ Under Article 227 Is Maintainable. The court resolved a conflict between two single judge decisions regarding the remedy available against decrees passed under Section 26A of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887.

7 Dec 2016

The case involved two writ petitions placed before a larger bench due to a conflict of decisions by single judges of the Bombay High Court regarding t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Franchise Dispute — Upholds Award on Refund of Security Deposit and Interest but Sets Aside Award on Loss of Profit and Other Claims. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and damages were perverse and contrary to terms of franchise agreement.

14 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Kuoni Travels (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Passport Renewal for Accused in Criminal Cases — Directs Issuance Without Impounding Subject to Conditions. Mere pendency of criminal proceedings does not justify denial of passport renewal under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967, and the Passport Authority must consider the request independently, subject to conditions to secure the petitioner's presence during trial.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by individuals who were denied renewal of their passports by the Passport Authority on the gro...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)