Search Results for "multiple suits"

386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Quashing of Criminal Proceedings for Offences of Forgery and Cheating in Property Dispute; Private Complaint Alleged to Mirror Civil Suit for Possession

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, dealt with a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Equipment Supply Dispute — Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Court Intervention. Existence of Arbitration Clause Confirmed; Court's Role Limited to Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Master Drilling India Private Limited, entered into an Equipment Supply Agreement dated 01.10.2021 with the respondent, Sarel Drill & ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Parallel Litigation Case — Abuse of Process of Law. Filing of Two Parallel Proceedings in Respect of Same Transaction Before Two Different Forums Constitutes Abuse of Process of Law Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

The petitioner, Mr. Hiremani Kallappa Melage, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Mayur Mulji Parmar and Bharat Mulji Parmar, were convicted by the Sessions Court, Mumbai, for the murder of an unknown woman and for c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Confirmation of Death Penalty and Appeals in Family Murders Case. Charges under Section 302 IPC for Killing Wife and Three Children Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The Confirmation Case No.3 of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No.518 of 2005 arose out of the conviction of the accused Ajitsingh Harnamsingh Gujral by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank Executive in Cheque Dishonour Case — Donation Not a Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 138 NI Act. Court held that a cheque issued as a donation without existing liability does not attract penal provisions under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Sashidhar Jagdishan, an individual aged 79 years and an executive at HDFC Bank, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of th...