High Court of Karnataka Quashes Parallel Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case — Abuse of Process of Law. Filing of two separate complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Section 420 IPC for same transaction constitutes abuse of process, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Hiremani Kallappa Melage, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of the order dated 13.08.2009 and the entire proceedings in CC No.1633/2009 pending before the J.M.F.C.-IV Court, Belagavi. The petitioner contended that the respondent, Lokmanya Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd., had filed two parallel proceedings in respect of the same transaction: one under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and another under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioner argued that the filing of two parallel proceedings before two different forums constituted an abuse of the process of law. The High Court heard the arguments of the petitioner's counsel, while the respondent's counsel did not appear despite several opportunities. The court examined the contention and found that the filing of two parallel proceedings for the same transaction was indeed an abuse of the process of law. The court held that the subsequent proceedings in CC No.1633/2009 were liable to be quashed to prevent abuse of the process of the court. Accordingly, the writ petition was allowed, and the order dated 13.08.2009 and the entire proceedings in CC No.1633/2009 were quashed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Proceedings - Abuse of Process of Law - Section 482 CrPC - Filing of two parallel proceedings in respect of same transaction before two different forums constitutes abuse of process of law - Held that the subsequent proceedings are liable to be quashed to prevent abuse of process of court (Paras 3-4).

B) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Parallel Proceedings - Section 138 - When a complaint under Section 138 of NI Act is already pending, filing a separate complaint under Section 420 IPC for the same transaction is not maintainable and amounts to abuse of process - Held that the proceedings in CC No.1633/2009 are quashed (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether filing of two parallel proceedings in respect of the same transaction before two different forums amounts to abuse of process of law and whether the subsequent proceedings are liable to be quashed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. The order dated 13.08.2009 and the entire proceedings in CC No.1633/2009 pending on the file of J.M.F.C.-IV Court, Belagavi, are quashed.

Law Points

  • Abuse of process of law
  • Parallel proceedings
  • Quashing of criminal proceedings
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Section 138 NI Act
  • Section 420 IPC
  • Same transaction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (02) 77

W.P. No.108994/2015 (GM-RES)

2019-02-01

H.P. Sandesh

Vitthal S Teli (for petitioner), Veeresh R Budihal (for respondent)

Mr. Hiremani Kallappa Melage

Lokmanya Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of criminal proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of order dated 13.08.2009 and entire proceedings in CC No.1633/2009 pending before J.M.F.C.-IV Court, Belagavi.

Filing Reason

Petitioner contended that respondent filed two parallel proceedings in respect of same transaction before two different forums, which is an abuse of process of law.

Issues

Whether filing of two parallel proceedings in respect of same transaction before two different forums amounts to abuse of process of law? Whether the subsequent proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that filing of two parallel proceedings in respect of same transaction before two different forums is an abuse of process of law. Respondent did not appear to argue despite several opportunities.

Ratio Decidendi

Filing of two parallel proceedings in respect of the same transaction before two different forums constitutes an abuse of the process of law, and the subsequent proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process of court.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner mainly contended that filing of two parallel proceedings in respect of same transaction before the two different forum is an abuse of process of law. The contention that proceedings in respect of same transaction before two different forums is an abuse of process of law is accepted.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of order dated 13.08.2009 and entire proceedings in CC No.1633/2009 pending before J.M.F.C.-IV Court, Belagavi. The petition was heard and reserved for orders on 23.01.2019, and order was pronounced on 01.02.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): Section 482
  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Section 138
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): Section 420
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Lays Down Procedure for Adoption Petitions Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 to Prevent Malpractices in Relinquishment of Children. Court Formulates Comprehensive Scheme for Ascertaining Genuineness of Biological Parents, Unwed Mo...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Under Section 394 of Companies Act, 1956 — Restructuring of Casby Group Approved. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary...