Search Results for "leave wages"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "leave wages"

1278 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1278 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that the workmen in a statutory canteen run by a contractor are not entitled to regularisation as employees of the principal employer under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 in Writ Petition No. 35453/2003. The appellant in WA No. 1980/2010 is BEML ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Interest Rate Reduced from 10% to 6%. The court upheld the recovery of principal amounts under Section 50 read with Section 48 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 but reduced the interest rate from 10% to 6% per annum.

23 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Lintas India Pvt Ltd, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 24th December 1999 in Recovery Application (ULP) No. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Challenging Reinstatement Order. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor System, Termination Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

17 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 17/9/1999, which reversed the Labou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Orders Against IIT Bombay in Contract Labour Case — Principal Employer Liable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. IIT Bombay held liable for gratuity of contract labourers despite absence of direct employer-employee relationship, as the definition of 'employer' under Section 2(f) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 includes the person who has ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment.

4 Oct 2024

The Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (IIT Bombay) filed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Autho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages for Illegal Termination. Services Rendered at Different Units of Same Employer Counted Together for Computing 240 Days Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

15 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited, challenged an award of the First Labour Court, Nagpur, which directed reinstatemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Workmen Held Not Employees of Respondent. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that the 21 persons named in the complaint were not employees of the respondent, as the respondent had ceased business and the workmen were employed by third parties.

5 Jul 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra General Kamgar Mahasangh, a trade union, filed a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Preventio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement Denied for Failure to Prove Continuous Service. The court held that the petitioner failed to discharge the burden of proving 240 days of continuous service under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the Industrial Court's reversal of the Labour Court's order was justified.

11 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Kawadu s/o Paikaji Parke, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court, Yavatmal, dated 17.11.2003, which set a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Provident Fund Office Against Garment Company — Holds Home-Based Women Workers Are Employees Under EPF Act. Piece-Rate Payment and Work From Home Do Not Exclude Workers from Definition of 'Employee' Under Section 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

24 Jul 2019

The present civil appeal arose from a challenge to the Bombay High Court's order dated 27.04.2012, which had set aside the Provident Fund Officer's de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Non-supply of Enquiry Report Before Dismissal Violates Natural Justice. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on punishment, holding that the Industrial Court erred in ordering reinstatement with full back wages without considering the gravity of misconduct.

11 Apr 2014

The petitioner, The Indian Seamless Metal Tubes Limited, is a factory covered under the Factories Act, 1948. The respondent workman was appointed on 0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Forest Development Corporation Case — Termination Without Domestic Inquiry Invalid Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer's failure to conduct proper inquiry and denial of opportunity to lead evidence renders termination illegal, warranting reinstatement with back wages.

27 Sep 2011

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM) challenging the orders of the Labour Co...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)