Search Results for "kicks"

306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Imprisonment Confirmed Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Common Intention Established Under Section 34 IPC for Fatal Assault During Altercation.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Rajes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shabbir Abalal Mujawar, was convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No. 67 of 1995 for the murder of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 326 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 4 April 2013 in village Nipani Jawalka, where the deceased Mahadeo was allegedly assaulted by the appellants. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 324 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Shaikh Javed and Shaikh Asad, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad for offences under Sections 302 and 324 read...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present appeal was filed by Babu Sakharam Dive, Laxman Raoji Dive, and Tryambak Raoji Dive (original accused nos. 1, 2, and 4) challenging the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Court Holds That Non-Compoundable Offences Can Be Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC if Settlement is Genuine and Voluntary, and Continuation of Proceedings Would Be an Abuse of Process.

The petitioners, eight individuals, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Consideration of Bail Orders. Detaining Authority's Failure to Interact with Witnesses and Consider Bail Orders Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Suraj @ Lalla Kalicharan Thakur, through his father, challenged the legality of a detention order dated 20/10/2022 passed by the Distr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Adjudicates Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree in Cruelty Case Under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Relying on Single Incident and Unproven Allegations to Dissolve Marriage.

The case concerns a Family Court Appeal filed by the wife against a divorce decree granted in favor of the husband on the ground of cruelty under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds State's Objection in Criminal Writ Petition, Dismissing Challenge to Initial Police Custody Remand. Accused Failed to Establish Violation of Constitutional Safeguards as Grounds of Arrest Were Communicated and Remand Order Became Infructuous After Bail Rejection.

The matter arose from an FIR registered on 18 July 2026 at Mandrem Police Station, Goa, against the petitioner and his father for offences under the B...