Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 128
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Shabbir Abalal Mujawar, was convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No. 67 of 1995 for the murder of Baby, the wife of the complainant, under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The prosecution case was that on 1st December 1994, the deceased was assaulted by the appellant and other accused with kicks, fists, and a knife following an altercation at a water tap. The complainant, who was selling tea, was informed by his daughter Rehana and rushed to the spot, but the deceased was declared dead on arrival at the hospital. The appellant challenged his conviction on the ground that most of the prosecution witnesses had turned hostile, and the evidence was insufficient to prove guilt. The High Court, after scrutinizing the entire record, found that indeed many witnesses had turned hostile and their testimony did not support the prosecution case. The court noted that the prosecution had examined 12 witnesses, but the material witnesses did not corroborate the incident. Consequently, the court held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and the appellant was entitled to acquittal. The appeal was allowed, and the conviction and sentence were set aside.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Hostile Witnesses - Sections 302, 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appeal against conviction - Appellant was convicted for murder of deceased Baby - Most prosecution witnesses turned hostile - Court held that when material witnesses turn hostile and their testimony is not corroborated by other reliable evidence, conviction cannot be sustained - Held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt - Appeal allowed, conviction set aside (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable in law when most of the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No. 67 of 1995 are set aside. The appellant is acquitted of the charges. His bail bonds stand cancelled.

Law Points

  • Hostile witness
  • Benefit of doubt
  • Acquittal
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
  • Appreciation of evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (07) 46

Criminal Appeal No. 747 of 1996

2005-07-20

V.G. Palshikar, R.C. Chavan

Mr. S.V. Marwadi for the appellant, Mrs. V.R. Bhonsale APP for State

Shabbir Abalal Mujawar

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal by challenging the conviction order

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Baby, and he appealed on grounds that most prosecution witnesses turned hostile and evidence was insufficient

Previous Decisions

The IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur convicted the appellant in Sessions Case No. 67 of 1995 on 9-12-1996

Issues

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC is sustainable when most prosecution witnesses have turned hostile

Submissions/Arguments

Learned advocate for the appellant argued that most witnesses turned hostile, leading to total failure of prosecution to prove its case, and thus the accused deserves acquittal Learned APP argued in support of the conviction

Ratio Decidendi

When material prosecution witnesses turn hostile and their testimony is not corroborated by other reliable evidence, the prosecution fails to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused is entitled to acquittal.

Judgment Excerpts

The basic contention of the learned advocate for the appellant is that most of the witnesses have turned hostile and therefore there is total failure on the part of the prosecution to prove its case and consequently the accused deserves to be acquitted. It is true as submitted by the learned advocate that some of the witnesses have turned hostile.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on 9-12-1996 in Sessions Case No. 67 of 1995. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay against the conviction. The High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 20-07-2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Mother in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimonies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing husband and daughter set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.