Search Results for "intimate connection"

302 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 302 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petitions in Preventive Detention Case Due to Irrelevant and Vague Grounds. Detention Under Preventive Detention Act Invalidated as Assaults on Solitary Individuals Do Not Constitute Disturbance of Public Order and Vague Grounds Violate Article 22(5) of Constitution.

This was a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution for a writ of habeas corpus filed by thirty persons detained under orders passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Environmental Clearance for Iron Ore Mine Expansion. Deletion of Time Condition by Competent Authority Held Valid, Mining Operations Not Illegal.

The petitioner, Shankar Raghunath Jog, a retired government servant and resident of Sancordem, Goa, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Guarantee and Pledge Against Company Pending Company Law Board Proceedings. Alleged Fraudulent Assumption of Liability by Directors Without Shareholder Consent Raises Serious Questions to be Tried.

The applicant, Rajinder Kumar Malhotra, filed an application in a pending company appeal seeking an interim injunction to restrain HDFC Bank from reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Seeks Resolution of Dispute Over Unauthorized Colony in Faridabad Through Arbitration and Committee Formation. The Court directs parties to submit responses on land extent, layout, and development charges to facilitate completion of the project.

The present dispute pertains to the claim of allottees who were not allotted plots on land owned by respondent No.6-Colonizer, Durga Builders Pvt. Ltd...