Search Results for "dissolved firm"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "dissolved firm"

249 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 249 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Appellate Court's Dismissal of Suit. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove agreement and readiness and willingness, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

3 Jan 2024

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property. The plaintiff, Manoj Manilal Gala (appellant), ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Penalty Under Section 69A of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 for Non-Intimation of Alterations. The court upheld the validity of the Maharashtra Amendment Act 29 of 1984 imposing retrospective penalty for failure to intimate changes in partnership deeds.

26 Sep 2006

The petitioners, M/s. Adamji Lookmanji & Co. and others, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 25th April, 2005 and 12th October, 2004 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Notices Against Directors in Central Excise Case — No Personal Liability Without Specific Statutory Provision. Directors of a company cannot be treated as assessees or deemed to be in default for excise duty demands under the Central Excise Act, 1944, in the absence of a provision akin to Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Sunil Parmeshwar Mittal and Kirti Trambaklal Shah, were directors of a company that was assessed for excise duty. The Deputy Commissi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Prosecution of Public Servant and Spouse in Prevention of Corruption Act Case for Disproportionate Assets. High Court's Discharge Order Quashed as It Erred in Re-appreciating Evidence at Charge Framing Stage Under Section 239 CrPC, Failing to Consider Prima Facie Case Based on FIR and Charge Sheet Materials.

5 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against the Madras High Court's judgment discharging a public servant and his wife from pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Suit — Trial Court's Judgment Set Aside for Failure to Frame Issues and Consider Evidence. Lower Appellate Court's Remand Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power to Prevent Failure of Justice.

27 Oct 2010

The case involves a property dispute over land Survey No. 50 admeasuring 26 acres 4 gunthas situated at village Asadullabag. The original plaintiff, K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Letters Patent Appeal Maintainable Against Order in PIL and Validates Judgment Pronouncement by Single Judge After Other Judge Ceases to Hold Office. The court ruled that an order refusing to recall an earlier order in a Public Interest Litigation is a 'judgment' under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, and a judgment prepared and signed by both judges of a Division Bench can be pronounced by one judge after the other demits office.

28 Feb 2006

The case arose from a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the appellant concerning environmental issues in Lonavala. A Division Bench of the Bom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against City Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Property Suit — Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction Decided Against Applicant. Court holds that City Civil Court has jurisdiction to try suit for specific performance and injunction where property value exceeds its pecuniary limits but suit was transferred from High Court under Section 15 of Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948.

21 Jan 2015

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendant (applicant) against an order dated 19th May 2014 passed by the learned ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit by Bristol Bakery Against Grupo Bimbo for 'Bimbo' Mark, Finding No Deceptive Similarity. The court held that the marks 'Bristol' and 'Bimbo' are not deceptively similar and that the defendant had prior rights, thereby refusing interim injunction and granting injunction in favor of the defendant.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between Bristol Bakery (plaintiff in one suit) and Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. DE C.V. and its affiliates (defendants in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders in Suit Under Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in Findings of Courts Below.

6 Jun 2022

The petitioner, M/s Columbia Hospital & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant No.9 in a suit filed by respondent No.1, M/s Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Lease Dispute, Reduces Mesne Profits Interest Rate. Court holds that interest on mesne profits should be at 6% per annum under Section 34 CPC, not 18% as awarded by trial court.

21 Mar 2017

The appellant, Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2009 passed in Special Civil Suit No.62/1996 by the trial c...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)