Search Results for "default dismissal"

1819 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1819 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Execution Proceedings for Decree Holder. Delay of 13 Years in Filing Execution Application Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown for Non-Filing Due to Pendency of Appeal and Other Proceedings.

The petitioner, M/s. Botanium Limited (now merged in Go Airlines (India) Limited), was the decree holder in Regular Civil Suit No. 292 of 1983. The su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Judgment on Default Bail in POCSO Case — Issues Framed on Section 193(2) BNSS. The Court Examines Whether Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days Entitles Accused to Statutory Bail Despite 90-Day Limit Under Section 187(3)(i) BNSS.

The case arose from a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the BNSS, challenging orders denying de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Examines Whether Appeal is Barred by Res Judicata and Abatement in Suit for Specific Performance; Court Notes that Plaintiffs Did Not Appeal Decree in Companion Suit and Failed to Bring All Legal Heirs On Record.

The appeal arises from the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2000 passed by the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 176 of 1991 and Regular Civil Suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Restoration Application. Delay Cannot Be Condoned Without Proper Application and Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Rajendra Namdeorao Akre, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11.09.2014 passed by the trial court in Misc. Civil Applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...