High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Company Appeal (L) No. 47 of 2012 Along with Connected Appeals and Applications. No substantive judgment text was provided; only the cause list and appearances were available.
6 Nov 2012...
Search Results for "competent authority order"
10097 result(s) found
Found 10097 result(s)
High Court
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Payment Order in License Fee Dispute — Sets Aside Direction to Pay Rs. 37.61 Lakhs Per Month Pending Trial. Court Holds That Order Under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC for Interim Payment Requires Admission of Liability or Undisputed Amounts, Not Determination of Disputed Claims.
1 Nov 2023The Appellant, Kavis Fashions Private Limited, challenged an order dated 4 January 2021 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane, allowi...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against State's Allotment of Surplus Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Right After Repeal. Land vested in the State under Sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, prior to its repeal, remains with the State and cannot revert merely because the Act was subsequently repealed.
27 Oct 2016The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Chhaganlal Khimji and Co. L...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Rules Against Stamp Duty on Amalgamation Orders Under Companies Act, 1956. Court Order Sanctioning Scheme of Amalgamation Is Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.
31 Mar 2016The case involved a reference under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, arising from a scheme of amalgamation between Reliance Industries Limited (transferee)...
- 180
High Court
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Challenge by Gram Panchayat Member Against Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(d) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Key Issue of Whether Removal Under Section 39(1) Automatically Triggers Six-Year Disqualification. The Court Analyzed the Effect of a Stay Order on an Appellate Reversal and the Jurisdiction of a Single Judge Under Chapter XVII Rule 18(3) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules.
16 Jul 2025The petition before the Bombay High Court arose from a disqualification order passed by the Additional Divisional Commissioner under Section 14(1)(d) ...
- 11
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Temple Pooja Rights Dispute. Appeals under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC challenge trial court's order restraining interference with hereditary archakas' rights at Shree Mahabaleshwara Temple.
24 Aug 2020The miscellaneous first appeals arose from a common order dated 2020-02-19 passed in Original Suit No. 2 of 2016 by the Principal District and Session...
- 68
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blanket Prohibitory Order Under Section 144 CrPC in Bengaluru, Holds It Violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b); Order Cancelling Protest Permissions Against CAA Struck Down as District Magistrate Failed to Apply Mind and Provide Material Facts.
13 Feb 2020The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 18 December 2019 issued by the District Magistrate-cum-Commissi...
- 66
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of MLA under Tenth Schedule on Grounds of Violation of Natural Justice and Bias. The petitioner, an independent MLA, alleged that the Speaker’s order disqualifying him was passed in a mala fide and biased manner without giving adequate opportunity to defend.
21 Dec 2005The writ petition (No. 107/2005) was filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa by a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) of Goa challenging his...
- 69
