Search Results for "beneficiary company"

456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Applicant in Cheating and Forgery Case — Investigation Complete, No Custodial Interrogation Required. Pre-arrest bail allowed under Section 438 CrPC for offences under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 BNS as investigation complete and applicant cooperated.

The applicant, Haribhau Dnyandev Chemte, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking pre-arrest bail in co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit Challenging Will on Grounds of Suspicious Circumstances and Lack of Testamentary Capacity. Will dated 9th March 1981 held not duly executed and attested as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case concerns a testamentary suit filed by Sulochana Dinanath Tarkar (since deceased, represented by her sons Sunil and Harish) seeking Letters of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Revenue's Appeals Against ITAT Decision Favoring Assessee on Deduction of Distributable Surplus Payment to Brand Owner. Court Examines Whether Payment is Allowable Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 or Constitutes Application of Income or Diversion by Overriding Title.

The present set of five tax appeals arises under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed by the Revenue against the common order of the Incom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Order in Bank Guarantee Dispute. The court held that the Debt Recovery Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain claims for recovery of amounts due under bank guarantees, and the petitioner's challenge was without merit.

The petitioner, Gammon India Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 28th September 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...