Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Municipal Council's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award on Permanency and Equal Pay. Court Upholds Permanency for Workmen Completing 180 Days and Daily Wage Calculation at 1/26th of Monthly Salary Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Shrirampur Municipal Council, a local body constituted under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats & Industrial Townshi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Tender Rejection by Government Company. Court upholds rejection based on past adverse order, holding that government companies can consider past performance in tender evaluation.

The petitioner, Design Dialogues (India) Pvt Ltd, a private limited company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Executing Court's Rejection of Time-Barred Application to Set Aside Auction Sale Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC. Application Filed 63 Days After Sale Found Barred by Limitation, Secured Creditor's Prior Charge on Property Upheld for Distribution of Sale Proceeds.

The petitioner, a borrower, had availed a housing loan from respondent No.1 finance company and mortgaged the purchased flat. Upon default, the lender...