Search Results for "arbitral awards"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "arbitral awards"

444 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 444 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Berth Reservation Dispute. Court Examines Whether the Claim Was Barred by Limitation and Whether the Award Was Patently Illegal Under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The judgment of the Madras High Court in OSA (CAD) No. 39 of 2021 involved an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Foreign Award Enforcement Case, Remands for Consideration of Group of Companies Doctrine. The court held that the group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement if there is commonality of interest and involvement in the contract.

27 Feb 2026

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a company incorporated in UAE, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.10.2023 in Arb.O.P.No.(Comm.Div.) 19...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatory. Group of Companies Doctrine Not Applicable Without Evidence of Mutual Intention to Bind Non-Signatory Under Sections 47-49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Feb 2026

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a UAE company, filed an appeal under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act and Section 50 of the Arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Award Was Not in Conflict with Public Policy and Did Not Suffer from Patent Illegality.

19 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Hi Style India Pvt. Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Arbitral A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition. Court holds that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the award was patently illegal for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider the appellant's counterclaim.

14 Mar 2025

The present appeal arises from a commercial dispute between M/s. Strategic Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) and Mphasis Limited (respondent). The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to MSME Facilitation Council Awards Against National Textile Corporation. Awards Upheld as Facilitation Council Had Jurisdiction Under MSMED Act and Awards Not Patently Illegal.

21 Mar 2023

The petitioner, National Textile Corporation Ltd., filed two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging awa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Dispute. Consolidation of Claims from Nine Contracts with Identical Terms Does Not Violate Fundamental Policy of Indian Law Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Feb 2023

The petitioner, BST Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd., entered into nine contracts with the respondent, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd., for the purchase o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable Due to Availability of Statutory Remedy Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 against arbitral award filed beyond limitation period under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable as efficacious alternative remedy exists.

27 Oct 2020

The Central Railway (Petitioner) awarded a contract to Maharashtra Steel Fabricators & Erectors (Respondent) on 31 December 2001 and 31 March 2002 for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitral award was not in conflict with public policy and did not suffer from patent illegality, as the tribunal's findings were based on evidence and were plausible.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, MPDA Associates Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)