Search Results for "annual value"

1150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Regarding Liability for Defects in Gas Turbine Generators. Award Deals with Claims for Damages Due to Breakdown and Repair Costs Under a Turnkey Contract.

The dispute arises from a contract between Thermax Limited (Petitioner) and Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (Respondent) for the turnkey instal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition by Corporation of the City of Panaji Challenging Compensation Award Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in the Award and Scope of Judicial Review Is Limited.

The petitioner, Corporation of the City of Panaji, challenged an award dated 08.07.2014 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) under Section 48 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Power Purchase Agreement Dispute — Fixed Costs Payable Irrespective of Energy Purchase. HERC Order Set Aside as Tariff Commission's Final Order Binding on Parties Under Section 86(1)(f) of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appeals arose from an Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) order dated 23.03.2012, which upheld the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commissio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal and Finds Compensation Awarded to Family of Quadriplegic Army Officer Inadequate. MACT Award of Rs.13,09,500 on Death Basis Held Not Just; Court Directs Enhancement Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Tetraplegia Resulting from Road Accident.

The case arose from a motor vehicle accident on 17 October 1991, when Bhagendra Singh, a non-commissioned officer in the Indian Army, was struck by a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Premium Paid Under ULC Act Government Resolution — Petitioner Cannot Claim Refund After Voluntarily Availing Benefit and Selling Land to Third Parties.

The petitioner, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd., was a beneficiary of an exemption order dated 29 February 1980 under Section 20(1) of the Urban La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand in Development Agreement Case — Delay and Lack of Speaking Order Render Proceedings Invalid. Section 33A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 invoked after 10 years without proper application of mind; order set aside.

The Petitioner, Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (now Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd.), a developer, entered into a Development Agreement with D.N. Nagar Shree A...