Search Results for "advocate duty"

10217 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10217 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case. Principles of Unjust Enrichment Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 Not Applicable to Refund Arising on Finalisation of Provisional Assessment.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai II appealed against the order of the appellate authorities below which allowed the refund claim of M/s. Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand and Order in Writ Petition by Petitioner Against State of Maharashtra Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Due to Time-Barred Proceedings and Erroneous Computation

The Petitioner, challenged Demand Notices and an Order by the Collector of Stamps and CCRA under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, alleging a deficit i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Application Seeking Reference of Questions of Law on Conversion of Bill of Entry. CEGAT Upheld Denial of Reconversion of Assessed Home Consumption Bill of Entry into Bond Bill of Entry Under Section 46(5) of Customs Act, 1962.

The applicant, Jain Irrigation Systems, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported a consignment of Pipe Head PHPO 40 under Customs Tariff Head 8477....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Unexecuted Lease Agreement — No Liability Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Adjudication under Section 31 cannot be basis for demand when document is not executed and no stamp duty is chargeable.

The petitioner, Crisil Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, had been in occupation of office premises at Hiranandani Business Park, ...