Search Results for "Section 363"

840 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 840 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part in Development Charge Levy Dispute. Development Charge on Already Developed Land Held Illegal Under Section 124 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Sir Gangadharrao Chitnavis Memorial Medical Research Trust, a charitable trust, owned Plot No. 56 at Temple Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case. Accused Convicted Under Sections 364-A, 363, 384, 120-B IPC for Abducting a Minor Boy and Demanding Rs. 15 Lakhs Ransom.

The case involves the abduction of a five-and-a-half-year-old boy, Atharva, from Raja Shivaji Nagar, Chinchwad, on 09/04/2010. The accused Nos. 1 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Age Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Testimony Lacked Corroboration.

The appellant, Prakash s/o Bhairuram Dhari, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nagpur in Special Child Cri. Case No. 37/2018 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder, Kidnapping, and Unnatural Offense Case. Circumstantial evidence including last seen together and recovery of body at instance of accused sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302, 363, 377, 201 IPC.

The appellant, Vaibhav Shantaram More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai, for offenses under Sections 363, 377, 302, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Girl. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence of Pregnancy Confirm Offences Under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ravindra @ Balu s/o Sonaji Hivrale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Based on Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence. Promise of Marriage to a 12-13 Year Old Girl Constitutes False Promise Vitiating Consent Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Bhaiyya Subhash Panpatil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case Due to Lack of Identification and Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 396 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove appellant's involvement beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Arjun Ganpat Sandbhor, was convicted by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Malegaon, for offences under Section 363 read w...