Search Results for "Rule 28(6)"

428 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 428 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Government Order on Health Department as Arbitrary. The Petitions Invoke Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India to Quash the Order Dated 14.05.2025 for Violation of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights.

The petitioners, including Jagadeesha Moger and others, filed a series of writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Customs Broker Licence Suspension Due to Delay in Submitting Inquiry Report. Interpretation of Regulation 20(5) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 — Whether Time Limit of 90 Days for Inquiry Report is Mandatory or Directory.

A group of customs appeals was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, against various customs broker licence holders before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Petition Against Rebate Claim on Exported Inputs/Capital Goods. Reversal of Cenvat Credit Does Not Constitute Payment of Duty for Rebate Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary to the Government of India dated 4 June 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maintenance for Wife and Daughters Under Domestic Violence Act Despite Prior Divorce Decree. Cohabitation After Divorce and Subsequent Second Marriage Constitute Domestic Violence Under Section 3 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Atmaram Sanap challenging concurrent orders of maintenance passed under the Protection of W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Civil Revision Application Against Land Acquisition Officer's Refusal to Refer Enhancement Compensation Claim. Case Raises Issue Whether Officer Can Reject Reference Under Section 34(1) of Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 When Agreement for Negotiated Price Exists.

The case arose from the acquisition of land Gut No. 26, admeasuring 2 H. 10 R, situated at Village Ladgaon, Aurangabad, belonging to the original owne...