Search Results for "Regional Sales Office"

290 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 290 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order Refusing Transfer of Company Petition. Chairman's Quasi-Judicial Order Held Amenable to Section 10F but Lacks Power to Transfer Part-Heard Matter or Constitute Special Bench.

The appeal arose from an order of the Chairman, Company Law Board (CLB) rejecting an application to transfer a partly-heard company petition from the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer in NSQ Case Due to Prejudicial Delay in Testing. Delay of 20 Months in Analysis of Drug Sample Violated Right to Challenge Government Analyst's Report Under Section 25(3) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by M/s Zim Laboratories Ltd. and its officers (the manufact...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent

The fixation of standard rent for an upscale apartment in Mumbai, which was rented to Maya Sunil Alagh, the wife of Britannia's former Managing Direct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...